<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drop Overtime in the NFL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativebox.net/jwill/2007/04/drop-overtime-in-the-nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativebox.net/jwill/2007/04/drop-overtime-in-the-nfl/</link>
	<description>The thoughts and insights of Willie Lavocritz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~keem</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebox.net/jwill/2007/04/drop-overtime-in-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>~keem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativebox.net/jwill/?p=123#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they just make it work like basketball. Remove the sudden death aspect and let the clock run. Whoever scores the most in the set amount of time wins. And yea, of course at this point it will come out to which team is more durable because it is hard enough to play that full sixty minutes. But this seems like the fairest solution to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just make it work like basketball. Remove the sudden death aspect and let the clock run. Whoever scores the most in the set amount of time wins. And yea, of course at this point it will come out to which team is more durable because it is hard enough to play that full sixty minutes. But this seems like the fairest solution to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
