• Search for:

• Categories

  • Education
  • General
  • iPhone
  • Jwill
  • Link
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Public Transportation
  • Social Networking
  • Sports
  • Tech

• Recent Posts

  • More On Central Falls
  • No Lesbians Here
  • Cutting Junk Food from Schools
  • Oh, Budget Cuts
  • What Was That “i” Thing, Anyway?

• Archives

  Select Month March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Source: The New Republic (tnr.com)
Read Article

Reid’s comment suggests that he associates Black English with lack of polish and low intelligence, okay. But before we burn him in effigy for it or ask “What’s that all about?” as if we don’t know, let’s admit that most Americans feel like Reid does. He wasn’t being a benighted “racist” holdout; he was speaking as an ordinary American person. We have caught him in nothing we don’t most of us feel ourselves.

John McWhorter delves into Harry Reid’s “no Negro dialect” comment. I love this analysis. While it is true that he should not have said this, we shouldn’t act like we don’t think this way ourselves. I had an argument over whether the African American Variant of English (as it’s officially called) should be discouraged. I really don’t think it should be. The problem isn’t that people speak this way; it’s how we react to it. AAVE has some very interesting, systematic constructions. For example, stated later in the article:

…Black English is as systematic as standard English, and what we hear as “mistakes” are just variations, not denigrations. Try telling a French person that double negatives are “illogical.” The “unconjugated” be in a sentence like Folks be tryin’ it out is used in a very particular way to indicate habits rather than current events, making explicit something that standard English leaves to context.

Constructions like this are quite interesting from a linguistic perspective (and having taken a linguistics class before, I definitely find it interesting myself). The proper English we speak today, of course, is the form accepted in regular society and formal interactions, and there’s no problem with that. But when people who speak AAVE are amongst themselves in informal settings, should we really look down upon their method of speech? Should we really judge them for it? Or should we try to understand their speech and see where they’re coming from? It’s controversial for sure.

Source: Boston.com
Read Article

[Arnold Schwarzenegger] said that in the last 30 years, prison spending increased from 3 percent of the state general fund to 11 percent while higher education spending declined from 10 percent to 7.5 percent.

“Spending 45 percent more on prisons than universities is no way to proceed into the future,’’ he said.

This op-ed by Derrick Z. Jackson brings up California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposal to bar the state from spending more on prisons than on higher education. I agree that we should not spend more money on prison than education. Perhaps this definition of “education” should extend beyond postsecondary education. How about all schools? Or, in general, how about we pay more attention to rehabilitating criminals than to just locking them up repeatedly? I agree with Jackson’s ending point regarding the cocaine laws:

The laws are so embarrassing that this week, in an interview with the Boston Globe editorial board, Democratic senatorial candidate and Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley called the cocaine laws “crazy.’’ It is refreshing to hear a Democrat like her and a Republican like Schwarzenegger say that our criminal justice priorities are insane, with education always getting the strait-jacket. It is the first step out of the asylum.

Source: Wired.com
Read Article

Using a simple scraping tool, a marketer could then turn a list of e-mail addresses into a rich, full-fledged set of markeying profiles, with names, pictures, ages, locations, interests, photos, wall posts, affiliations and names of your friends, depending on how users have their profiles set. Run a few algorithms on that data and you can start to make inferences about race, income, sexual orientation and interests.

While that information isn’t available for all users, Facebook changed its privacy settings in early December so that certain information can’t be made private, including one’s name, current city, profile picture, gender, networks and friend list (the latter can be somewhat hidden from public view).

Anyone with your e-mail address can harvest that information, the company admits.

This doesn’t sound good. I’m still on Facebook and I really do need to cut it from my list of social networks. Problem is, I do still use it for promoting events for my residents and keeping in touch with a few of them. But, I digress. Definitely give this report a read.